|
Post by betweenthesticks on Aug 13, 2022 18:43:33 GMT
Cheers for that Phil.
So, we were robbed by the ref. There's no way he could justify any 'judgement' that led to an extra 24% extra time being played.
Sad for the club, players and staff who have worked so hard, and the fans, to be done over by the incompetence of one individual who has no stake in the game.
I'd vote we get to see the real time on the score board. If the ref elects to add extra extra time, then he should indicate that just like they do before the 90 minutes are up. Then everyone know what game they are in.
Still a fair result though...
|
|
|
Post by borobob on Aug 13, 2022 18:48:51 GMT
I suppose the referees get out of jail card is "there will be a minimum of 5 mins extra time"!! 96 mins 12seconds lets him off the hook I imagine!!
Not arguing about the pen, just Jack's naivety, and Dulwich's willing to dive at every opportunity, which the ref bought in to, and it just felt like he was waiting for a Dulwich chance!!
Gutted of course, and we deserved better, but I just hope a few go our way in the rest of the season!
Two keepers booked and two pens! Don't see that very often.
On to Tuesday.
|
|
|
Post by betweenthesticks on Aug 13, 2022 19:20:54 GMT
Bob - the minimum word does seal it for the ref. But is that OK and not subject to scrutiny in this day and age?
We all remember 'Fergie Time'..!
I'll shut up and move on!
See you Tuesday...
|
|
abc123
1st team regular
Posts: 51
|
Post by abc123 on Aug 13, 2022 19:55:18 GMT
Also good to see stewards dealing with the usual culprit(s) at half time. And have since seen a post of social media that one of them is on their final warning
|
|